MEASURABLE TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

THE INFRASTRUCTURE DIFFERENCE

WHY IS DIRT SITES BETTER THAN THE WEBSITE YOU ALREADY HAVE?
Because the difference is measurable.

We are not asking you to prefer our colors, typography, or design style. We are comparing load speed, mobile performance, technical quality, site structure, accessibility, security, crawlability, search readiness, infrastructure, and ongoing technical management. These standards are measured by real scans.
SCAN MY CURRENT WEBSITE → VIEW THE REPORT DATA ↓
RESEARCH DATA • 15,542 PUBLIC WEBSITES SCANNED

THIS IS WHERE MOST WEBSITES FALL

Data from the Website Quality Report measuring 15,542 completed public website scans.

99.68% Scored Below 90 (Only 0.32% reached 90+)
60.45 Average Overall Site Score across 15,541 scans
7.19s Average Measured Load Time (62.6% > 5 seconds)
63.15% Scored Below 70 on Mobile Devices

THE DATA IS NOT CLOSE

Comparing public web scan benchmarks directly against Dirt Sites launch standards.

MEASURED STANDARD PUBLIC WEBSITE DATA (15,542 SCANS) DIRT SITES LAUNCH STANDARD
Average Load Time 7.19 Seconds 1.7 Seconds
Average Overall Site Score 60.45 / 100 94+ / 100
Completed Scans Reaching 90+ Score 0.32% of websites 100% of Dirt Sites
Completed Scans Scoring 90.01 to 100 0.24% (Only 37 sites total) Every Dirt Site
Mobile Score Below 70 63.15% (9,814 sites fail) 0% (100% Pass Rate)
Ongoing Technical Management No post-launch management 100% Managed Infrastructure

YOUR WEBSITE IS MORE THAN WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

A website can look good on a laptop screen and still perform terribly underneath.

WHAT THE CUSTOMER SEES:
  • • Colors & typography
  • • Company logo
  • • Jobsite photos
  • • Headline copy
  • • Button styling
WHAT THE SCAN SEES:
  • • Server response time (TTFB) & code weight
  • • Mobile rendering & layout stability (CLS)
  • • Image compression & next-gen WebP delivery
  • • Security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
  • • Schema.org JSON-LD structured data & metadata
  • • Crawlability, indexability, & redirect chains

DIRT SITES STARTS WITH THE INFRASTRUCTURE

Most websites begin with a generic WordPress template or visual page builder. Then the agency stacks on themes, visual builders, contact form plugins, analytics scripts, security plugins, caching plugins, image plugins, and backup tools.

Every added layer introduces more code weight, plugin conflicts, security risks, and slow load times.

PERFORMANCE IS BUILT INTO THE ARCHITECTURE

Dirt Sites works from the opposite direction. The hosting environment, website architecture, code output, image delivery, mobile presentation, intake forms, tracking systems, and security layers operate inside one unified, managed system. Performance is part of the architecture—not an optional optimization added after launch.

THIS IS NOT A DESIGN COMPARISON

Your current website and Dirt Sites are not competing over which homepage looks prettier. They are competing on measurable technical output:

SPEED: How quickly does the site load?
MOBILE: How well does it operate on mobile?
QUALITY: What does the full scan reveal underneath?
STRUCTURE: Can search engines understand your territory?
SECURITY: Is it protected, backed up, & monitored?
MANAGEMENT: Who maintains the system post-launch?

SOURCE & DATA TRANSPARENCY

The Website Quality Report is a public research report based on point-in-time scans of 15,542 public websites. This is not a private Dirt Sites sales document. The methodology, findings, limitations, and source files are publicly available for review, citation, and analysis.

VIEW PUBLIC REPORT → READ METHODOLOGY → DOWNLOAD SOURCE DATA →

THE AVERAGE WEBSITE SCORES 60.45.
DIRT SITES LAUNCH AT 94+.

That is why Dirt Sites is better. Move your company onto infrastructure engineered to win jobs, rank locally, and stay managed after launch.

CALL NOW TEXT US SCAN MY CURRENT WEBSITE →